Archive for February, 2008
Creating and Using Images
Posted by mcgelligot in Uncategorized on February 28, 2008
I have found images explaining an article to be a crucial enhancement. Though they can be time consuming, they are also fun to do. I use Jasc Paint Shop Pro for my artwork. I have issues with version 8 I have trouble drawing lines with it. If I draw two lines one after the other without going back to the selection tool and clicking it on and off, the whole program seizes up. Not sure why this happens, but I work around it.
But with this program I can create about anything I want, if I just work with it long enough. Yesterday, I put together a little article on street sweepers. I decided that the air cycle of the machine needed a diagram. I could have drawn a diagram freehand, which is something I frequently do, though not necessarily well. I brought up the old Jasc program and using the little shapes available, including buttons and arrows and text put together an image.
The object in creating a web page is to give the user the most informative and entertaining experience within your means. This includes your time and money. This image for the street sweeper page took me about an hour to create:

It probably does not reach professional standards but it gets the point across. I don’t hesitate to also put my scribblings on a page if I think they will help. It is a simple matter of a scan and then a conversion to a jpg file on my Jasc. For example, this image explains photosynthesis:
![]() |
No, it isn’t the most eye-catching image around, but it does have that sort of chalk-talk appeal, as if it was created on the fly while someone was doing an in-depth explanation of the process. This was indeed the case. I explained the process to my daughter who is taking a course in biology. I simply copied the diagram over to remove some of my insistant arrows and circles. In all, images don’t have to be perfect or great to add to a page. Yet do have some standards. My standards are admittedly low when it comes to form but high when it comes to content. I think this is where it counts. It is better to be informative than beautiful.
I shouldt also mention that I will occasionally buy images. I get them from istockphoto (I get no commission for this mention). They have a lot of great photos that can be purchased for very little. Another source of images for me is Clip Art Etc associated with USF. These are free to use with an attribution. I usually give them a footnote at the end of an article.
Writing for EzineArticles
Posted by mcgelligot in Uncategorized on February 22, 2008
Today I crunched out an article on Monopoly Tournaments for EzineArticles. This is one of the top sites for article submission. I am constantly debating with myself whether submitting material to this kind of article submission site is a good idea. Sure, it is a legitimate way to get information out and at the same time publicize your websites. And yet I wonder whether simply adding more content to InDepthInfo might not be a better idea.
Getting links from outside is always desired, and this kind of trade, giving up decent content for links is probably a good trade. But in the back of my mind, I get this nagging feeling that making my own website better with this same content – exclusive to myself – might not in the long run benefit the website more. It might give it some added stickiness, and at the same time expand the “long tail” and also get more natural links from people who are interested in the content.
Truthfully, I have not done much of this type of article submission up until now. But entering into the Web 2.0 world, I figure I need to “do as the Romans do”. I have shot out three articles that have been approved…
It is worthwhile? After over 100,000 page views on 138 articles (over what amount of time he does not say) the Business Blogger seems to think it worthwhile. He even points to a 15 percent clickthrough to his own websites. He also says that most of the articles only have a short staying power. They seem to stop getting much traffic after a week or so.
On InDepthInfo articles seem to do fairly well in general. They do fluctuate when pulling in traffic, but they tend not to taper off. This might be partly because I try to write articles that will not be dated quickly. In any case, it is one more reason to wonder if writing articles on someone else’s website is truly productive.
There are even Ezine scammers out there. I am sure most are on the up-and-up, but some do make promises that they cannot keep, and it only goes to show that if you do not control the platform that your work could be misused or even disappear without a trace. I do like having pretty complete control over my content.
Well, all this considering has led me where I usually get to on these issues, nowhere. I suppose that I will continue to post a few articles to the article websites and monitor the results.
Helping the Laggard
Posted by mcgelligot in Uncategorized on February 16, 2008
One of my bad habits is to look at my stats way too much. I don’t know if it is work avoidance or just an addiction to numbers that are meaningless to just about everyone but myself. Since I once stared for an unremitting month at the option tables of CVX I must say that addiction had something to do with it. But this fascination for stats fosters another problem. I tend to focus on the bad stats. Then I set myself to work to correct the problems that caused them.
This sounds good, but I think I would be much better off by concentrating on the good stats and then working to make them better. A case in point: Last year about this time I created a series of home improvement sites for InDepthInfo (eight of them actually). Some did very well, and are pulling in good traffic and actually serving a purpose by clearly explaining how to do various home improvement projects. Some are doing middling, though just as well written. Others are laggards.
Now, what do you think that I would focus on? Well, the laggards, of course. I want all of the websites to do well. They are like my children. I tend to help the one who needs help the most when they need it. For this reason, I have recently begun to lavish attention on WallpaperHowTo. It is about what you would expect from me, a website about how to hang wallpaper. There is tolerable writing, good structure, drawings from my own hand, all bucked up by my own experiences wallpapering and writing.
I think it has lagged for two reasons. First, and I cannot fix this problem, it must compete with the home improvement topic, and then it confuses the search engines because there are so many sites out there that feature the kind of wallpaper that hangs on your computer screen. (As you can imagine, I have the same problem with my WindowHowTo website.) Second, it was one of the last of the batch of sites I created. For this reason, I did not do much to promote it. Usually, I will write to a few people to try to get links for it, maybe do a bit of work on directories, maybe write an article for one of the Ezine publishers. For WallpaperHowTo, I ended up doing this sporadically, if at all. I would rather be writing a new web page and leave that promotion stuff to someone else.
But I know that I cannot do this because there is no one else. So, as I stare at the stats, I see this poor website not doing as well as the others. I feel guilty because of past neglect and I set to work on it. For WallpaperHowTo I decided that a makeover was in order. The site was not W3C compliant, so I updated the format. I added an about page, a privacy page and even a “resource” page. I updated the few footnotes, and then I stewed over what to do next. All this took several hours.
My question to the reader, as well as myself is. Would it not have been smarter for me to have done the same thing to my drywall website which is doing so much better? An improvement in that website would undoubtedly pay me better because it is at that position in the search engines that a movement of one place up can mean hundreds of page views per day.
I like to believe that my head rules my activities. But I often find that this is not the case, especially when applied to my children…err websites.
Starch: A Passion
Posted by mcgelligot in Uncategorized on February 13, 2008
I pride myself a bit on my cooking. Not that I am a great chef. I am more the kind of guy who can slap together a respectable meal in less than an hour with whatever ingredients come to hand with no forethought. I make up recipes on the fly. I have a pretty good instinct for what spices will work in what dish, and I can usually combine dishes to make a harmonious meal. Not that my family often gives me 5 stars, except my son, the eating machine, who doesn’t chew his food long enough to taste it.
When choosing articles to write, I often use the same instinct. I have a pretty good knack for knowing what goes together, where the links should go, and what facts are best incorporated. This is why I now have a trio of sites on the most consumed food group, starch. It started several years ago when I read and wrote a review of The Potato: How the Humble Spud Rescued the Western World, by Larry Zuckerman. The fascinating book made me believe that potatoes could be the subject of a great website! I then went about creating one of the first websites to adorn InDepthInfo. It is simply called Potato!
The success of Potato has led to the addition of two other starchy websites, Let’s Make Pasta and Rice. All are on InDepthInfo.
I am not certain of the statistics, but starches, in the forms noted above must be the world’s most consumed foods. Because of this, they tend to be searched for fairly frequently. But then, too, there is a lot of competition out there for eyeballs on these topics. The nice thing about InDepthInfo is I rarely worry too much about competition when I decide to go to work on a website. It is my belief that if I choose to write articles on subjects about which I am interested, I am more likely to write something interesting, something that will do well in spite of any competition. Because of this, there tends to be synergy between articles and sites. On InDepthInfo the articles tend to get at least a bit of traffic whatever I decide to write about.
More on the Segway
Posted by mcgelligot in Uncategorized on February 9, 2008
After going on about the Segway I thought I should own up to the fact that I was actually burning up to get one when they first came out, but restrained myself knowing my penchant for getting into a craze too early and paying either way to much, or getting a product that was obsolete before the mail person dropped it off on the front door step.
I still think they are cool, but impractical. Anyhow, I started to poke around the net regarding the Segway. I ran across a blog entry that featured a photo of the Segway Beta. This was a humorous mock-up showing a man riding a hand cart backward. The idea tickled my fancy so I decided to do a little promotional video spoof featuring this “Segway Beta”. Being relatively new to creating videos, I had a learning curve to overcome. It took me 8 hours to make a 1 minute spot with a few basic special effects. I won’t consider it time well spent until the video is viewed once for every minute I put into it.
I put the video on a Squidoo page. The page is a kind of mock landing page for the Segway Beta. I don’t expect that I will sell too many hand carts as a result.
All this, of course, is a huge diversion from what I really should have been doing, finishing up video for my Toilet website, and adding a section on rice to InDepthInfo. But sometimes you have to pick up a project because it is plain fun.
W3C Won’t Validate YouTube Video
Posted by mcgelligot in Uncategorized on February 7, 2008
I can hardly tell you how frustrated I get trying to make webpages W3C compliant. It is as if the people who make up the standards purposely make the standards impossible. A perfect example of this is the fact that a lot of Amazon code and YouTube do not validate. So if you want to put a YouTube video on your site with anything like a reasonable cut and paste, you are out of luck. The fact is that YouTube uses the <embed> tag, and W3C says this is a no-no. You have to go through all kinds of gyrations to get the thing to work. Why something so common can’t validate with a simple cut and paste is beyond me.
Okay I am ranting. It is just that I have had to make so many compromises to get my code to validate. Now that I have decided to integrate video into my websites, I am confronted with yet another obstacle to validation. I created a video showing a butterfly coming forth from its cocoon. I got so frustrated trying to make the thing validate on the webpage, that I typed beneath the validation logo, “Validates except the YouTube video.”
This whole validation thing has me bugged. I wonder how many sites actually do validate. With all the video out there, it can’t be too many. I can see a reason for standards, but it seems like the people who are making the standards have no concept of what web site builders need.
When creating a template for my websites, I ran into interminable problems just trying to come up with a way to have three columns on a page and end up with a footer. I worked for several days, just to do get validated what used to be a few lines of code and a table or two. I am still not happy with the hack that I had to do to make it work. Now why couldn’t the CSS people and the W3C people have tried actually building a few sites and iron out these kind of problems, rather than let developers agonize over problems that really have no meaning? The number of man hours thrown away addressing these problems must be astronomical.
“Why bother?” you may well ask. Two reasons really. The first is, by validating every page, my code gets checked for accuracy. The second is my sneaking suspicion that Google checks it and it may influence how the algorithm sees my web page.
Segway to Kindle
Posted by mcgelligot in Uncategorized on February 5, 2008
The recent release of the Kindle by Amazon.com in many ways reminds me of their exclusive right to sell the Segway. It had to be six, or seven, or more years ago that I wrote an ad for the Segway for InDepthInfo. At the time, I thought the Segway was kind of cool, but I also thought it impractical. I wrote the ad on the off chance that someone might buy one. I actually did sell two of them, but Amazon only paid $12.00 commission on an item that went for over $1000.00. They would be ridiculed today for being so parsimonious.
I don’t think that the low commissions then are why the Segway hasn’t been the revolution in human transportation that its manufacturers and the fawning press predicted a few years ago. The Segway is still around, in fact I saw it in a cameo in a Superbowl commercial the other day. It never caught on because it would be hard to park securely in the city. It is ultimately limited by its battery. I can see it being handy for a supervisor in a warehouse, but for going downtown to Seattle to go shopping? Where do you put the packages? How do you get it on the bus if coming in from the suburbs? No, it really is just an item to tool around the neighborhood as a brief novelty. The price of the item is pretty steep, when you could just get yourself a motorized scooter!
Well, I don’t think the Kindle is quite so impractical. Yet it has the same feel. People are not ready to give up their books, and those who are don’t have time to read books anyway. They are too busy IMing or Blogging, or plugging into the 24 hour news cycle. Having written a few books, I thought I would check out the Kindle with a view to publishing one of my previously unpublished works. (I have an inventory of these larger than I would like to admit.) The publishing process proved so cumbersome, I gave up after three hours of fiddling. I am no techno-geek, but I am not a babe on the internet highway either. When, I finally gave up working on it at 1:00 in the morning, I thought, “I’ll finish this up tomorrow.” But I never could make myself get back to it. There were too many higher priority items to work on, like making a video, or playing a game of minesweep.
Well, if the interface for converting a word document to Kindle is that unfriendly, I am wondering how the interface is with the reader. The hardest thing about it is that battery thing. You want to be able to take a book camping. You want to be able to plop it on the library table and wander around looking for another and not have to worry that someone is going to pick it up and wander off with it. It may well be tough and rugged, but can you make margin notes or dog-ear your favorite pages? I could be wrong in this pronouncement, but the time for the Kindle has not quite arrived. In fact, I think it will become passe in the near future. It will be like the Segway in that we will think back and smile at our naivete in a few years hence.
Even so, I think a good book reader that will blow our socks off is just around the corner, and I will have to eat my words. Luckily they will be tiny dots of light and not ink stained pages.
